So the EditReady converted HLG is probably correct, and it matches the h.265 once I add the "full to legal" lut to the h.265. However I feel the recorded HLG is interpreted incorrectly by Resolve because of its incorrect metadata. It means the converted HLG doesn't match the Atomos recorded HLG. Something interesting though is that if I convert the HLG h.265 to ProRes using EditReady, it preserves the metadata tags. I had also used Editready to convert F-log clips, and it fixed the problem I'm reporting about the incorrect video levels interpretation of h.265. We weren't paying much attention to the Atomos setup so maybe there was a "HLG" switch on it that tells it to embed the correct metadata. Matrix coefficients : BT.2020 non-constantįor the externally recorded ProRes it's all BT.709 for those tags which is clearly incorrect. What I did notice is that the metadata tags for the internally recorded HLG are: However as a workaround I'm using the "full to legal" lut for now. So right now, my test is inconclusive even after rolling back to Resolve 15 to do a sanity check. I've done some HLG tests with the caveat that I seem to be seeing this "video levels" interpretation issue with full range h.265s now in Resolve 16 (see my post above). It's a shame not more people talk about this issue which is big to me (external recording with all these cameras having a shift in color and gamma). Do you know if Sony's color difference between internal/external is the same interpretation problem from the NLE as with Fujis ?Īnyway, very interesting video. Anyone knows if I can use Bakos 's LUT ? Maybe you have a fix ? You seem to know much about these issues. I'd like to get the exact same starting point when I record externally. They are more orangey and weird after applying a rec709 lut to the slog2 footage. 2.6.3 is the minimum version supporting macOS 10.15. I just bought the Ninja V (despite Jeromy Young's crazy act ) and I can't get the same skin tones with externally recorded prores files. With todays release of macOS 10.15 Catalina, weve updated EditReady to add full support. I've developped my "looks" for h264 files from my Sony's. And there's also a slight shift in color. The luminance range isn't the same (I knew the fix, to go from video range to full range, or the other way around). I know there's the same problem with Sony external recorded files. The external files were the defective ones. Apply a LUT to preview your LOG media in video, or with a specific predetermined look. Bakos in your video you say it only affects fuji internal files, so no issue with ninja v files recorded from xt3 ? EditReady allows you to screen your camera original media files before you transcode them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |